Having invested some more energy concentrate the zones of Positivism and Interpretivist in the territory of instructive research I have dissected the fundamental contrasts between the two methodologies with the goal that I can figure out where my position may lie. Post Positivism This is generally regarded as a “scientific” approach with methods used that are highly organised, measurable and based on approaches taken by the scientific community involved in researching behaviours in the natural world. The researcher will not be involved with those involved in the research topic and will often use observations as a method of obtaining information. Martyn Denscombe (1998) describes how for positivists, the aim of social research is to discover the patterns and regularities of the social world by using the kind of scientific methods used to such good effect in the natural sciences. Key features: Scientific Objective Robust Involves identifying causes Tests hypotheses Uses the methods of the natural sciences External reality need to collect ‘facts’ Use of statistics (quantitative) […]
Post Positivism vs Interpretivist approach
